|
Num Posts
Sort Order
|
nine1wing
New User
| Posts: 16
| Joined: 06/06
Posted: 05/07/08 10:31 AM
|
|
So I just watched the 04 mustang shoot out in the video section, and it shows a stock mach 1 in his first 1/4 mile run a 13.15 with regular tires. That time is better then everyone who has posted in the 1/4 miles runs and thats including mods on our cars,(bolt ons) I have 18in stock tires, cowl hood, under drive pulleys, cold air kit, predetor tune, 3.73 gears and flowmaster mufflers, my best time before the gears were changed was a 13.55. THe mach 1's don't have over 300 hp do they? HOw are they faster?
|
|
Posted: 05/07/08 11:19 AM
|
|
The mach one is a DOHC aluminum engine with 305 hp and 320 lb.ft. with a factory curb weight of 3,450 lbs with 3.55 gears
The 05 Gt is a SOHC three valve aluminum with 305 hp and 320 lb.ft. and a factory curb weight of 3,450 lbs and 3.55 gears (w/ manual trans)
So basically you are looking at driver skill, temperature and elevation if your car and the mach are both manuals.
Big Thanks to my friends at KR Performance and Restoration out of Nebraska
|
gazgreg
New User
| Posts: 4
| Joined: 05/08
Posted: 05/08/08 11:15 AM
|
|
I just bought a 03 mach 1 and the factory number is 305 hp but they say that that is low.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 05/08/08 02:11 PM
|
|
The Mach one was rated @ 335 ft-lbs torque and has a higher rev limit,which allows a third gear 1/4 mile through the lights. The 05-present GT has too shift into 4th gear. This small difference comes into play in controlled conditions like a drag strip.Mach I ratings;Horsepower: 310 @ 6,000 rpm Torque : 335 ft-lb @ 4,200 rpm Mustang GT ;Horsepower 300 @ 6,000 rpm Torque 315 lb-ft @ 4,500 rpm
|
|
Posted: 05/09/08 06:23 AM
|
|
Man i hate to break it to you but even a 5.0 can beat one of the new S197's. Trust me all i have on my 85 5.0 is a full exhaust, underdrive pulleys, BBK Cold Air box and a short throw and i gave it a run for its money. I do believe it all relates to how much the S197's weight, i think 3450 lbs. seems a little low for that car to be honest with you.
|
|
Posted: 05/09/08 07:33 AM
|
|
Probably is low, factory weight ratings tend to be lower than the actual weight people see but that is why I gave the factory rating for both cars. It was just to show that the cars are about on an even playing field. AS for blueoval nut, I will say that the higher rpm redline is true (6,800) as long as it is a manual. The automatic has a cast instead of forged crank and has a lower redline (stupid I know, I found out from a guy who bought an auto and then found out this little detail). But the guy who started this post didn't say weither the car he watched was a manual or not.
Big Thanks to my friends at KR Performance and Restoration out of Nebraska
|
nine1wing
New User
| Posts: 16
| Joined: 06/06
Posted: 05/10/08 06:05 AM
|
|
sorry in the video the guy was driving a stick. If you want to see the video just go to the video section on this sight and look at the one that says 04 mach 1 mustang shootout
|
biz4765
New User
| Posts: 11
| Joined: 09/07
Posted: 05/11/08 10:05 AM
|
|
Mach 1 has more power and is lighter, not to mention that POS 2 piece driveshaft the s197 has robbs it of about 2 tenths off the bat until you change it.
2006 GT 2200 miles all stock
|
ParisDude
New User
| Posts: 4
| Joined: 07/08
Posted: 07/11/08 06:39 PM
|
|
The latest MM&FF had a shoot-out of 7 cars all running naturally aspirated engines. It showed the 01 Stangs weighing between 3100 and 3200 lbs. S197s weigh at least 3450 and probably over 3500 lbs. That's a lot of weight difference which surely accounts for the better ETs on the earlier Stangs.
|